TRADITIONAL APPROACHES TO WORK ACCIDENT ANALYSIS
FEATURES, SHORTCOMINGS AND A NEW SUGGESTION FOR AN APPROACH BASED ON SYSTEMS THEORY
Keywords:
accident analysis, work accidents, STAMP, CAST, human error, systems theory, labor inspectionAbstract
Traditional accident analysis approaches – such as Swiss Cheese and Root Cause Analysis – are widely used by academics and occupational health and safety professionals in the study of these events. However, for the most part, these traditional approaches are based on theories from the 1990s that, although useful, are not able to adequately deal with all the complexity of the modern world, which includes interaction between man, machine, algorithm, and environment. Equally, these approaches: limit the learning potential of an adverse event; are influenced, to an undesired level, by the subjectivity of the analyst; and suffer from hindsight bias, inevitably representing “human error” or “unsafe act” as one of the contributing factors of the accident. The STAMP/CAST approach, based on Systems Theory, is presented as an alternative to overcome the limitations of traditional tools. Several studies have shown that STAMP/CAST was superior to traditional techniques in identifying causal factors and generating recommendations for preventing new accidents.